Super Cassette Industries Ltd. v. Hamar Television Network Pvt. Ltd.
- Jul 6
- 2 min read
A landmark copyright infringement case affirming that unauthorized television broadcasting of copyrighted musical works and sound recordings constitutes copyright infringement.
Short Description About the Case
This case involved Super Cassette Industries Ltd. (T-Series), one of India's largest music companies, and Hamar Television Network Pvt. Ltd. The dispute arose when the defendant allegedly broadcast copyrighted songs, music videos, and sound recordings belonging to Super Cassette Industries without obtaining a valid licence. The case is significant because it reaffirmed the exclusive rights of copyright owners over broadcasting and communication of copyrighted musical works to the public.
Facts
Super Cassette Industries Ltd. owned copyrights in a vast catalogue of sound recordings, cinematograph films, music videos, and musical works under the Copyright Act, 1957.
Hamar Television Network Pvt. Ltd., a television broadcaster, allegedly telecast the plaintiff's copyrighted songs and music videos through its television channel without obtaining any licence or authorization from Super Cassette Industries.
Super Cassette Industries contended that the unauthorized broadcasting of its copyrighted works infringed its exclusive rights to communicate the works to the public and deprived it of legitimate licensing revenue.
The plaintiff sought a permanent injunction restraining the defendant from further broadcasting its copyrighted content without permission.
Findings
The Court observed that copyright owners possess the exclusive statutory right to broadcast and communicate their copyrighted works to the public.
The Court emphasized that television channels cannot broadcast copyrighted songs, music videos, or sound recordings without first obtaining a valid licence from the copyright owner or an authorized licensing body.
The Court further held that commercial broadcasters are legally bound to respect copyright licensing arrangements, and unauthorized broadcasting amounts to copyright infringement irrespective of the broadcaster's commercial intentions.
The Court also observed that unauthorized television broadcasting causes financial loss to copyright owners and adversely affects the copyright licensing system established under the Copyright Act.
Suggestion
This case is highly useful in matters involving copyright infringement, television broadcasting, sound recordings, music videos, broadcasting rights, communication to the public, copyright licensing, and media rights.
It can be cited where television channels, cable operators, broadcasters, or media organizations telecast copyrighted songs, films, music videos, or other protected content without obtaining a valid licence.
For practical legal use, this case supports the principle that broadcasting copyrighted musical works or sound recordings without authorization constitutes copyright infringement, and copyright owners are entitled to injunctive relief and other statutory remedies.
Judgment
The Court granted relief in favour of Super Cassette Industries Ltd. and restrained Hamar Television Network Pvt. Ltd. from broadcasting, communicating, reproducing, or commercially exploiting the plaintiff's copyrighted musical works, sound recordings, and music videos without obtaining proper authorization.
The judgment reaffirmed that television broadcasters must obtain valid copyright licences before communicating copyrighted content to the public, thereby strengthening copyright enforcement in India's broadcasting industry.



