top of page


eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C.547 U.S. 388 (2006) | Supreme Court of the United States
A landmark patent law case holding that patent owners are not automatically entitled to a permanent injunction after proving patent infringement. Short Description About the Case This case involved eBay Inc., one of the world's largest online marketplaces, and MercExchange, L.L.C., the owner of patents relating to electronic marketplace technology. MercExchange alleged that eBay's online auction platform infringed its patents and sought a permanent injunction to stop eBay fro


Amazon Seller Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.
A landmark trademark and e-commerce case examining the liability of online marketplaces for the unauthorized sale of branded products and protection of intellectual property rights. Short Description About the Case This case involved Amazon Seller Services Pvt. Ltd., Flipkart Internet Pvt. Ltd., and 1MG Technologies Pvt. Ltd. as e-commerce platforms, and Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., Oriflame India Pvt. Ltd., and Modicare Ltd., which operate under the direct selling busi


Facebook, Inc. v. Power Ventures, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (2016) Suitable Tagline A landmark copyright and computer law case holding that unauthorized access to an online platform after revocation of permission may constitute infringement and violation of computer access laws. Short Description About the Case This case involved Facebook, Inc., the operator of the world's largest social networking platform, and Power Ventures, Inc., a company that provided users with a service to a


SAP SE v. TomorrowNow Inc.
A landmark software copyright and trade secret case establishing that unauthorized downloading and use of enterprise software support materials constitutes copyright infringement. Short Description About the Case This case involved SAP AG (now SAP SE) through its subsidiary TomorrowNow Inc., and Oracle Corporation. TomorrowNow provided third-party software support services to Oracle customers. Oracle alleged that TomorrowNow unlawfully downloaded millions of copyrighted softw


Dell Computer Corporation v. Arun Kumar & Ors.Delhi High Court
A landmark trademark and domain name infringement case protecting the well-known DELL trademark against unauthorized commercial use and deceptive domain names. Short Description About the Case This case involved Dell Computer Corporation, the internationally renowned computer manufacturer and proprietor of the DELL trademark, and Arun Kumar & Ors. The defendants were using the mark DELL as part of their business name and domain name in relation to computer-related goods and s


HP Inc. v. Dynamic Enterprises
A landmark trademark infringement case protecting the HP brand against counterfeit computer products and unauthorized use of its registered trademark. Short Description About the Case This case involved HP Inc., the globally renowned manufacturer of computers, printers, and related technology products, and Dynamic Enterprises, which was alleged to be dealing in counterfeit and unauthorized HP products. HP claimed that the defendants were using the HP trademark without authori


LG Electronics Inc. v. Bharat Bhogilal Patel & Ors.
A landmark trademark case distinguishing genuine parallel imports from trademark infringement and protecting consumers from unauthorized distribution practices. Short Description About the Case This case involved LG Electronics Inc., the proprietor of the well-known LG trademark, and Bharat Bhogilal Patel & Ors. The dispute arose when the defendants imported and sold genuine LG electronic products in India without authorization through LG's official distribution network. LG a


Panasonic Corporation v. Shah Agencies
A landmark trademark infringement case protecting well-known trademarks against unauthorized sale of counterfeit and deceptively branded electronic goods. Short Description About the Case This case involved Panasonic Corporation, the proprietor of the internationally renowned PANASONIC trademark, and Shah Agencies, a dealer alleged to have sold electronic goods bearing the PANASONIC trademark without authorization. Panasonic contended that the defendants were dealing in count


Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v. Green Cartridge Co. (Hong Kong) Ltd.
A landmark patent law case clarifying the doctrine of patent exhaustion and the distinction between lawful repair and unlawful reconstruction of patented products. Short Description About the Case This case involved Canon Kabushiki Kaisha, the Japanese manufacturer of Canon printers and patented ink cartridges, and Green Cartridge Co. (Hong Kong) Ltd., a company engaged in collecting, refilling, and reselling used Canon ink cartridges. Canon alleged that Green Cartridge's act


Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. v. Kapil Wadhwa & Ors.
A landmark trademark case clarifying the doctrine of exhaustion and the legality of parallel imports of genuine goods. Short Description About the Case This case involved Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., the owner of the well-known SAMSUNG trademark, and Kapil Wadhwa, who was engaged in importing and selling Samsung products in India. The dispute concerned the import and sale of genuine Samsung products that had been first sold abroad and later brought into India without Samsung


Bharti Airtel Ltd. v. Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd.
A landmark telecom and trademark case affirming that comparative advertising is permissible, but it must not mislead consumers or disparage a competitor's brand or services. Short Description About the Case This case involved Bharti Airtel Ltd., one of India's leading telecommunications companies, and Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd. The dispute arose over comparative advertisements and promotional campaigns relating to mobile telecommunications services. Airtel alleged that Jio's


Tata Sky Ltd. v. National Internet Exchange of India (NIXI)
A landmark domain name and trademark protection case recognizing that deceptive domain names can infringe trademark rights and mislead consumers. Short Description About the Case This case involved Tata Sky Ltd., a leading Direct-to-Home (DTH) television service provider, and the National Internet Exchange of India (NIXI), the registry responsible for managing India's “.in” domain names. The dispute arose over the registration and use of a domain name incorporating the well-k


Saregama India Ltd. v. Next Radio Ltd.
A landmark copyright licensing case affirming that FM radio broadcasters must obtain valid licences before broadcasting copyrighted sound recordings. Short Description About the Case This case involved Saregama India Ltd., one of India's oldest and largest music companies, and Next Radio Ltd., an FM radio broadcaster operating Radio One. The dispute arose over the broadcasting of Saregama's copyrighted sound recordings and musical works without complying with the terms of a v


Reliance Big Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. v. Multivision Network
A landmark copyright enforcement case protecting cinematograph films against unauthorized cable television transmission and public exhibition. Short Description About the Case This case involved Reliance Big Entertainment Pvt. Ltd., a leading film production and distribution company, and Multivision Network, a cable television operator. The dispute arose when the defendant allegedly transmitted and exhibited the plaintiff's copyrighted cinematograph films through its cable te


Eros International Media Ltd. v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL)
A landmark copyright licensing case affirming that telecom operators cannot commercially exploit copyrighted content without complying with valid licensing agreements. Short Description About the Case This case involved Eros International Media Ltd., one of India's leading film production and distribution companies, and Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), a public sector telecommunications company. The dispute arose from the commercial use and distribution of Eros's copyrighted


Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd. v. Dish TV India Ltd.
A landmark copyright and broadcasting rights case affirming that television broadcasters are entitled to protect their copyrighted content and enforce valid licensing agreements against unauthorized retransmission. Short Description About the Case This case involved Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd. (ZEEL), one of India's leading television broadcasters, and Dish TV India Ltd., a Direct-to-Home (DTH) service provider. The dispute arose over the retransmission of Zee's televi


Star India Pvt. Ltd. v. Moviestrunk.com & Ors.
A landmark copyright enforcement case protecting broadcasters and digital content owners against online piracy through rogue websites. Short Description About the Case This case involved Star India Pvt. Ltd., one of India's leading broadcasters and content owners, and Moviestrunk.com along with several other piracy websites. The dispute arose from the unauthorized uploading, streaming, downloading, and distribution of Star India's copyrighted films, television programmes, and


Netflix Inc. v. Tamilrockers & Ors.
A landmark copyright enforcement case protecting OTT platforms against online piracy and unauthorized streaming of copyrighted content. Short Description About the Case This case involved Netflix Inc., one of the world's leading OTT streaming platforms, and Tamilrockers, a notorious piracy website. The dispute arose from the unauthorized uploading, reproduction, distribution, and streaming of Netflix's copyrighted films and web series through piracy websites without obtaining


Super Cassette Industries Ltd. v. Hamar Television Network Pvt. Ltd.
A landmark copyright infringement case affirming that unauthorized television broadcasting of copyrighted musical works and sound recordings constitutes copyright infringement. Short Description About the Case This case involved Super Cassette Industries Ltd. (T-Series), one of India's largest music companies, and Hamar Television Network Pvt. Ltd. The dispute arose when the defendant allegedly broadcast copyrighted songs, music videos, and sound recordings belonging to Super


Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd. v. Eastern India Motion Pictures Association
A landmark copyright case defining ownership of copyright in musical and literary works incorporated into cinematograph films. Short Description About the Case This landmark case was decided by the Supreme Court of India and involved the Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd. (IPRS) and the Eastern India Motion Pictures Association (EIMPA). The principal issue was whether lyricists, composers, and authors retained independent copyright in literary and musical works after those
bottom of page