Ericsson vs. Lava International Ltd

"Protecting Innovation: Upholding Patent Rights"

The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Ericsson) against Lava International Ltd, directing Lava to pay ₹244 crore for infringing Ericsson's 2G and 3G patents. Here's a breakdown of the case:

Case Overview :

Ericsson sued Lava for infringing eight standard essential patents (SEPs) related to 2G and 3G technology. The court found Lava to be an "unwilling licensee" due to its failure to negotiate with Ericsson in good faith.

Key Findings :

- Lava delayed negotiations and didn't respond to Ericsson's offers.

- The court relied on the local commissioner's report and precedents to conclude that Lava's actions constituted patent infringement.

- Ericsson was entitled to damages and injunctive relief.

Judgment:

- Lava was directed to pay ₹244 crore to Ericsson.

- The court restrained Lava from using Ericsson's SEPs without a license.

- Lava was considered an "unwilling licensee" due to its conduct during negotiations.

This case highlights the importance of good faith negotiations in patent licensing agreements, particularly for standard essential patents. Ericsson has been involved in similar disputes with other companies, such as Lenovo, where the Federal Circuit vacated a district court's denial of injunctive relief.