top of page


What is the Brand ?
What is a Brand? A brand is more than just a logo or a name; it encompasses the entire perception of a company, product, or service in the minds of consumers. It is a complex mix of attributes, emotions, and experiences that shape how a business is viewed in the marketplace. The Key Components of a Brand Understanding what constitutes a brand involves recognizing its key components: Name: The name of the brand is often the first point of contact with consumers. It should be m


Castrol Ltd. v. A.K. Mehta
A landmark case against counterfeit goods and misuse of a reputed trademark. Short Description About the Case This case involves Castrol Ltd., a globally recognized lubricant manufacturer, and A.K. Mehta, who was alleged to have dealt in counterfeit products bearing the “Castrol” trademark. The dispute focused on trademark infringement, passing off, and protection of consumers from fake products. The case is significant for emphasizing strict action against counterfeiting and


Hero Honda Motors Ltd. v. Shree Assuramji Scooters
A significant trademark case protecting brand reputation against unauthorized commercial association. Short Description About the Case This case involves Hero Honda Motors Ltd., one of India’s leading automobile manufacturers, and Shree Assuramji Scooters, who allegedly used the “Hero Honda” mark without authorization. The dispute concerned unauthorized use of a reputed trademark in business activities and whether such use amounted to infringement and passing off. The case is


Time Incorporated v. Lokesh Srivastava
A landmark case recognizing punitive damages in intellectual property infringement matters. Short Description About the Case This case involves Time Incorporated, the internationally reputed publisher of “TIME” magazine, and Lokesh Srivastava, who was alleged to have used the well-known trademark and copyrighted material without authorization. The case is significant because the Court strongly addressed piracy and infringement and emphasized the need for punitive damages to d


Najma Heptulla v. Orient Longman Ltd.
A notable copyright case on authorship, publication rights, and protection of literary works. Short Description About the Case This case involves Najma Heptulla and Orient Longman Ltd. concerning alleged unauthorized publication and copyright issues relating to literary material. The dispute focused on ownership of copyright, publication rights, and whether the defendant had reproduced protected content without proper authority. The case is significant for clarifying the righ


Kirloskar Diesel Recon Pvt. Ltd. v. Kirloskar Proprietary Ltd.
A landmark case on protection of well-known trademarks and corporate name misuse. Short Description About the Case This case involves the well-known “Kirloskar” group and a defendant company using the name “Kirloskar” as part of its corporate identity. The dispute centered on whether the use of a reputed trademark as part of a corporate name amounts to infringement and passing off. The case is significant for reinforcing protection of well-known marks against dilution and una


Bennett Coleman & Co. Ltd. v. Union of India
A landmark case protecting freedom of press and circulation rights under constitutional law. Short Description About the Case This case involves Bennett Coleman & Co. Ltd., one of India’s leading newspaper publishers, challenging government restrictions imposed on newsprint usage. The dispute raised important questions regarding freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. The case is significant because it recognized that freedom of the press


K.R. Chinna Krishna Chettiar v. Sri Ambal & Co.
A landmark case on phonetic similarity and deceptive resemblance in trademark law. Short Description About the Case This case involves a dispute between two parties using similar trademarks “Sri Ambal” and “Sri Andal” in relation to snuff products. The issue before the Court was whether the similarity in sound and overall impression of the marks was likely to cause confusion among consumers. The case is significant for establishing that phonetic similarity plays a crucial rol


Hamdard National Foundation v. Abdul Jalil
A significant case on descriptive trademarks and the limits of exclusive rights over common words. Short Description About the Case This case involves Hamdard National Foundation, known for its popular product “Rooh Afza,” and Abdul Jalil, who used similar descriptive terms in relation to beverages. The dispute focused on whether commonly used or descriptive words can be exclusively protected as trademarks. The case is important as it clarifies the distinction between descrip


MySpace Inc. v. Super Cassettes Industries Ltd.
A landmark case defining intermediary liability in online copyright infringement. Short Description About the Case This case involves MySpace, a social media platform, and Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. (T-Series), a major music copyright owner. The dispute centered on unauthorized uploading of copyrighted music on the platform and whether MySpace could be held liable for such infringement. The case is significant for clarifying the scope of safe harbour protection for inter


Kent RO Systems Ltd. v. Amit Kotak
A key case on online intermediary liability and trademark infringement in e-commerce platforms. Short Description About the Case This case involves Kent RO Systems Ltd., a well-known water purifier brand, and Amit Kotak, who operated an online platform dealing with products bearing the “KENT” mark. The dispute focused on whether online sellers and platforms could be held liable for listing and selling products that allegedly infringed a registered trademark. The case is signi


Carlsberg Breweries A/S v. Som Distilleries & Breweries Ltd.
A landmark design law case recognizing protection for composite designs and their individual elements. Short Description About the Case This case involves Carlsberg Breweries and Som Distilleries concerning infringement of registered bottle designs used for beer products. The dispute centered on whether individual elements of a registered design could be protected separately and whether the defendant’s bottle design amounted to infringement. The case is significant as it clar


Shree Nath Heritage Liquor Pvt. Ltd. v. Allied Blender & Distillers Pvt. Ltd.
A trademark dispute emphasizing deceptive similarity and protection of brand identity in the liquor industry. Short Description About the Case This case involves a trademark dispute between Shree Nath Heritage Liquor Pvt. Ltd. and Allied Blender & Distillers Pvt. Ltd., relating to the use of similar brand names and trade dress in alcoholic beverages. The case highlights the importance of distinct branding and examines whether the defendant’s mark created confusion among consu


Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
A landmark pharmaceutical patent case balancing innovation rights and public access to medicines. Short Description About the Case This case involves Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), a global pharmaceutical company, and Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, an Indian generic manufacturer. The dispute centered on alleged patent infringement relating to a patented anti-diabetic drug. The case is significant as it addresses the grant of interim injunctions in patent disputes and the balance betwe


Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Apotex Inc.
A key pharmaceutical patent case on validity, anticipation, and protection against premature generic entry. Short Description About the Case This case involves Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), a major pharmaceutical company, and Apotex, a generic drug manufacturer, concerning the validity and infringement of a patented drug. The dispute focused on whether the patent was valid or anticipated by prior art, and whether Apotex’s generic version infringed the patent. The case is signif


Sanofi v. Apotex Inc.
A leading pharmaceutical patent case on obviousness and the validity of drug patents. Short Description About the Case This case involves Sanofi, a pharmaceutical innovator, and Apotex, a generic manufacturer, concerning the validity of a patent for a specific drug compound. The dispute primarily focused on whether the patented invention involved an inventive step or was obvious in light of prior art. The case is significant because it clarifies the legal test for “obviousnes


Allergan Inc. v. Apotex Inc.
A significant pharmaceutical patent case on validity, infringement, and protection of innovative drugs. Short Description About the Case This case involves Allergan Inc., a pharmaceutical company, and Apotex Inc., a generic drug manufacturer, concerning alleged patent infringement. Allergan claimed that Apotex sought to manufacture and market a generic version of its patented drug before the expiry of its patent rights. The case is important because it deals with the balance


Crocs Inc. v. Bata India Ltd.
A significant case on design protection and the limits of exclusivity over functional product features. Short Description About the Case This case involves Crocs Inc., known for its distinctive footwear design, and Bata India Ltd., which marketed similar-looking products. Crocs claimed that Bata had infringed its registered design rights by selling footwear with a similar shape and appearance. The case is important because it addresses the balance between protecting registere


Motorola Inc. v. Hytera Communications Corp.
A major case on intellectual property misuse involving trade secrets, copyright, and unfair competitive advantage. Short Description About the Case This case involves a dispute between Motorola and Hytera concerning the alleged misappropriation of confidential information and intellectual property relating to digital radio technology. Motorola claimed that former employees joined Hytera and unlawfully used proprietary information to develop competing products. The case is sig


Intel Corporation Inc. v. CPM United Kingdom Ltd.
A leading case on trademark dilution, requiring proof of actual link and harm to reputation or distinctiveness. Short Description About the Case This case is a landmark decision on the concept of trademark dilution under European law. Intel, the owner of a globally recognized mark, challenged the use of the mark “Intelmark” by CPM for marketing services. The dispute focused on whether the use of a similar mark, even for unrelated services, would dilute the distinctiveness or
bottom of page