top of page
trademark breadcrumb.png

Johnson & Johnson v. Medserve (Delhi High Court, 11 March 2025)

Delhi HC imposes ₹3.34 crore damages on Medserve for counterfeiting Johnson & Johnson’s medical devices; holds such counterfeiting a grave public health risk.


Short Description


Johnson & Johnson discovered counterfeit surgical devices being sold under their trademarks SURGICEL, ETHICON, and LIGACLIP. After raids and investigation, Medserve was found responsible. The Delhi High Court awarded heavy damages and a permanent injunction to protect patient safety.


Facts


  • Complaint filed in 2019; counterfeit products traced to Medserve, operating since 2017.

  • Products exported internationally through middlemen in the U.S. and UAE.

  • Large stock of counterfeit medical devices seized in raids.

  • Medserve even attempted bribery to avoid legal action.


Findings


  • Counterfeiting medical devices is not mere trademark infringement but a serious endangerment of human life.

  • Medserve acted deliberately with reckless disregard for patient safety.

  • Public interest and health are paramount in IP cases involving medical devices.


Suggestions


  • Strong enforcement against counterfeiters in the medical field is essential.

  • Patients and hospitals must verify sources of surgical products.

  • Courts should continue imposing exemplary damages to deter such offenders.


Judgment


  • Permanent injunction restraining Medserve from using SURGICEL, ETHICON, LIGACLIP marks.

  • Destruction of all counterfeit stock.

  • Compensatory damages: ₹2.34 crore.

  • Punitive damages: ₹1 crore.

  • Litigation costs to be reimbursed.


Judgment Date : 11 March 2025



 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page