top of page


Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991)
“Sweat of the brow is not enough; originality is required for copyright.” Short Description: The Supreme Court ruled that compilations of...

JK Muthu
Oct 11, 20251 min read


Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. Varsity Brands, Inc., 580 U.S. 208 (2017)
“Design elements on useful articles can be copyrighted if they can exist independently.” Short Description: This Supreme Court case...

JK Muthu
Oct 10, 20251 min read


Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC, 598 U.S. 105 (2023)
“Parody does not automatically protect against dilution of a famous mark.” Short Description: The Supreme Court considered whether parody...

JK Muthu
Oct 9, 20252 min read


Rogers v. Grimaldi, 875 F.2d 994 (2d Cir. 1989)
“Titles of artistic works are protected by the First Amendment if they have artistic relevance and are not explicitly misleading.” Short...

JK Muthu
Oct 8, 20252 min read


Iancu v. Brunetti, 588 U.S. ___ (2019)
“The government cannot refuse to register trademarks just because they are immoral or scandalous.” Short Description The U.S. Supreme...

JK Muthu
Oct 7, 20251 min read


Matal v. Tam, 582 U.S. (2017)
“The First Amendment forbids the government from banning trademarks it deems offensive.” Short Description The U.S. Supreme Court struck...

JK Muthu
Oct 6, 20251 min read


Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.
"Trademark law cannot be used to extend the protection of a public domain work." Short Description In this landmark U.S. Supreme Court...

JK Muthu
Oct 4, 20252 min read


Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. Hunting World, Inc., 537 F.2d 4 (2d Cir. 1976)
“A mark’s strength depends on where it lies on the spectrum of distinctiveness.” Short Description This U.S. case established the famous...

JK Muthu
Oct 3, 20252 min read


Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc.
“A product’s design, standing alone, is not inherently distinctive — it must earn its identity with consumers.” Short Description The...

JK Muthu
Oct 3, 20252 min read


Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc., 505 U.S. 763 (1992)
“Inherently distinctive trade dress deserves protection under the Lanham Act—even without proof of secondary meaning.” Short Description...

JK Muthu
Sep 30, 20252 min read


Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co
“A color alone can serve as a badge of origin — provided it identifies the source and is nonfunctional.” Short Description This U.S....

JK Muthu
Sep 29, 20252 min read


Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc., 572 U.S. 898 (2014)
"Clarity Counts — Ensuring Precision in Patent Claims for Fair Protection and Notice" Short Description : This U.S. Supreme Court case...

JK Muthu
Sep 27, 20252 min read


Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 572 U.S. 545 (2014)
Easing the Path to Attorney’s Fees — Making Patent Litigation Fairer for the Victim of Baseless Claims" Short Description : This U.S....

JK Muthu
Sep 26, 20252 min read


TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC, 581 U.S. 258 (2017)
Bringing Patent Venue Back Home — Defining Where Patent Cases Can Be Filed" Short Description: This U.S. Supreme Court case addressed...

JK Muthu
Sep 25, 20253 min read


Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., 579 U.S. 93 (2016)
"Punishing Willful Infringement — Restoring Judicial Discretion in Patent Damages" Short Description: This U.S. Supreme Court case...

JK Muthu
Sep 24, 20252 min read


Bilski v. Kappos, 561 U.S. 593 (2010)
"Defining the Future of Innovation — The Limits of Patentable Ideas" Short Description: This U.S. Supreme Court case addressed whether a...

JK Muthu
Sep 24, 20252 min read


Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.,
"When Amendments Speak Louder Than Words — The Reach of the Doctrine of Equivalents” Short Description: This is a U.S. Supreme Court case...

JK Muthu
Sep 24, 20252 min read


KSR International Co. V. Teleflex Inc.
“Supreme Court broadened the standard for determining obviousness in patent cases” Facts Teleflex held a patent for an adjustable pedal...

JK Muthu
Sep 24, 20251 min read


Association for Molecular Pathology V. Myriad Genetics, Inc.
“Supreme Court held that naturally occurring DNA cannot be patented, but synthetic DNA (cDNA) can be” Facts Myriad Genetics discovered...

JK Muthu
Sep 24, 20251 min read


Mayo Collaborative Services V. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.
Short Description Supreme Court ruled that laws of nature cannot be patented unless there is an additional inventive concept. Facts...

JK Muthu
Sep 18, 20251 min read
bottom of page